{"id":4640,"date":"2019-04-05T09:34:52","date_gmt":"2019-04-05T09:34:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thecpr.org.uk\/?post_type=product&p=4640"},"modified":"2019-04-05T09:40:51","modified_gmt":"2019-04-05T09:40:51","slug":"23-8-on-disfiguration","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/thecpr.org.uk\/product\/23-8-on-disfiguration\/","title":{"rendered":"23.8 On Disfiguration"},"content":{"rendered":"

Disfiguration involves a distinctive process whereby the body in performance, or an existing artwork, may be subject to an intervention which intentionally overhauls, distorts or betrays it; disfiguration may \u2018twist\u2019 the original work, to use the term of the artist Richard Hawkins. The body may also inflict its own disfigurations, and display or project them in performance. This issue opens up ground for original explorations and interrogations of disfiguration as an idea, procedure or entity with an often-intimate and beguiling approach to performance. Disfiguration resonates with seminal bodies of performance work such as those of Antonin Artaud, Tatsumi Hijikata and Ko Murobushi, but also forms a vitally aberrant strand in contemporary performance, including its digital art dimensions. Research into disfiguration may explore the work of theorists such as Bataille, but also entails the formulation of new kinds of corporeal analysis. The essays and artists\u2019 pages in this issue engage with preoccupations with disfiguration in multiple and often-contrary ways. In all of its manifestations, disfiguration marks a transmutation in the status of the body which performances envision, archive, excavate or sound.<\/p>\n

Read the editorial and abstracts for the issue here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Editorial\u2009: On disfiguration<\/strong>
\nStephen Barber, Richard Gough<\/p>\n

Richard Hawkins and the Disfiguration of the Archive<\/strong>
\nStephen Barber<\/p>\n

Delectable Parts [artist\u2019s pages]<\/strong>
\nRichard Hawkins<\/p>\n

Processes of Corporeal Corruption and Objective Disfiguration\u2009: in Tatsumi Hijikata\u2019s 1960s Butoh<\/strong>
\nKatja Centonze<\/p>\n

Processes of Disfiguration within the Dance of K\u014d Murobushi<\/strong>
\nRomina Sylvia Achatz<\/p>\n

From the Figure to the Cipher\u2009: Figuration, disfiguration and the limits of visibility<\/strong>
\nMarielle Pelissero<\/p>\n

Disfiguration, Obliteration\u2009: What remains of the body in the works of Unica Z\u00fcrn and VALIE EXPORT<\/strong>
\nRose-Anne Gush<\/p>\n

The Wall of History<\/strong>
\nJeremy Biles<\/p>\n

Breaking the Mirror<\/strong>
\nFrancesca Steele<\/p>\n

Rescaling the Private\u2009: Extimate miniaturization in the theatre of Niwa Gekidan Penino<\/strong>
\nCorey Wakeling<\/p>\n

Android Corporeality, Transhuman Performance and the Japanese \u2018Mind\u2019<\/strong>
\nYuji Sone<\/p>\n

Performing Sufi Disfiguration\u2009: Transformation of the self<\/strong>
\nEsra \u00c7izmeci<\/p>\n

For the Love of Elu\u2009: Steven Cohen\u2019s gentle endocannibalism<\/strong>
\nRobyn Sassen<\/p>\n

Monstrosity\u2009: The face of war<\/strong>
\nMischa Twitchin<\/p>\n

Under the Influence of \u2026 Affective Performance<\/strong>
\nZoe Zontou<\/p>\n

The Torture of the 100 Pieces\u2009: A work in progress by Martin Bladh and Karolina Urbaniak<\/strong>
\nMartin Bladh<\/p>\n

Apocalipsis Cum Disfiguris [artist\u2019s pages]<\/strong>
\nHans-Peter Litscher<\/p>\n

Performing Disfiguration\u2009: Staging of relationalities in Pottan Teyyam<\/strong>
\nAkhila Vimal C.<\/p>\n

Theatre, Representation and the \u2018Other\u2019 : Recent books on theatre and disability [review]<\/strong>
\nMorgan Batch<\/p>\n\n\n